25 CZEGHA Elizondo
Team Horacio Elizondo had the pleasure of refereeing one of the most
entertaining matches of football at this World Cup. Czech Republic’s golden
generation had started their last big tournament with a smashing of the United
States, yet they were overrun by a Ghana side that went on to become one of the
most positive surprises of this tournament.
For Elizondo and his assistants, the attractiveness of the wild attacking
football shown especially in the second half was not as important as for the
viewer though. The Argentinian trio had a very challenging match on their
hands, with both Assistant Referees having to assess numerous offside/onside
decisions.
Elizondo himself proved to be a very sophisticated referee. His
decision making and presentation was free of the theatrics sometimes associated
with South American refereeing. While there was no great deal of interaction
with the players – the game was simply too fast-flowing for such scenes – his
authority was never once in question. His fitness was excellent, and he was
both mentally and physically fresh for the entirety of the match.
In matters disciplinary, the final tally of seven yellows and one red
card is misleading. Elizondo’s disciplinary control is best described with keeping a lid on it. Especially regarding tackles, the Argentinian let quite
a few of these go. Every booking given was either mandatory or well-selected.
The opening card came after a minute full of hefty challenges and quelled any rough
play for a long time. His control-focused line was good, although there were a
number of mistakes in his foul detection, which I would describe as his area
for improvement. Without sufficient replays, it is hard to say what was a very
lenient play-on or a foul of course. That also includes a no foul call that led to the penalty call for Ghana.
If the match in the second half was a storm, Elizondo was the utterly
calm eye in the centre of it. Even in the match’s most crucial situation, the
penalty and RC for DOGSO against the Czech Republic, the referee remained
composed. After pointing to the spot, he apparently conferred briefly with AR1
(what happened wasn’t shown live due to replays) before sending Ujfaluši off with a
straight RC. Some criticized this as confusing, but in my book, Elizondo was
merely making sure that such an important decision was taken correctly. Since
the entire process did not even take a minute, the Argentinian referees did
everything right here.
Both ARs were extremely challenged. In the final 20 minutes, AR1 Darío García had to
assess Ghanaian attacks basically every minute and while only few replays were
shown, those we saw were all correct, including crucial ones like the onside
before the penalty (65’), an onside before the second Ghanaian goal (82’) and
to cancel a third Ghanaian goal (89’). While AR2 Rodolfo Otero was less challenged in the
second half, he nevertheless had three crucial decisions himself: Correct
onside on Ghana’s first goal (2’) and to cancel the Czech’s potential equalizer
for offside (46’). He can be supported in a very tight call against Ghana in
32’.
Overall, the Argentinian refereeing team made sure with a very successful performance that the press and fans were free to talk about the great football
they had seen in this game and not about the referees. Well done!
Team Elizondo looked indeed like a team during the entire tournament, with trust and consultation between the referee and his ARs. Elizondo's decisions were always respected even in difficult moments. Congratulations!
ReplyDelete